The Art of the Consistent Restaurant

Restaurant kitchens, by and large, are inconsistent. They perform differently at lunch and dinner, and on a slow Wednesday versus a jamming Saturday. A chef teaches a new line cook how to season to taste with a pinch of salt, then doesn’t notice as those pinches turn into handfuls.

Restaurants can also be incredibly expensive, and guests don’t really want to know about the kitchen shift schedule or training manual. They just know the food took forever and was salty AF. They’re one and done, thumbs down, one star.

More Top Picks Feedback

That’s why I think those of us who make it our business to review restaurants, as well as those of us who like to leave long posts on Reddit, and even those of us who are the friends with the best go-to recommendations should make it our business to ask and answer these questions:

1. Is a second meal more or less satisfying than the first?
2. How much do the same dishes change from one visit to the next?
3. Do you notice any patterns? Are the small plates better than the large ones? The cold food better than the hot? Fish better than meat? Early better than late?
4. Can you offer any advice that lets people know how consistent a restaurant is, what issues to watch for, and how to best enjoy it?

Years ago in a different city, the critic from another publication and I both gave an ambitious steakhouse with a huge menu the same rating: 4 out of 5 stars. Later we discussed it and both admitted that we admired rather than loved the cooking (the flavors were very BIG! And BUSY!) but we both found the execution of each dish close to flawless. The place was always packed, and the pace was always brisk. I compare that to the food writers who like to brag that they can tell if a restaurant is good or not as soon as they make their first vibe check, to which I say: you do you; I don’t believe it.

Another way to look at the question of consistency is with one of those 2×2 matrix memes. Imagine the east-west axis is inconsistent-to-consistent and the north-south axis is good-to-bad. Let’s start in the upper left quadrant, where we’ll plot restaurants that are overall good but also tend toward inconsistency. Here is where I’ll put some small independent restaurants that oftentimes have kitchens crammed into awkward or insufficient spaces. They may not handle volume well (and, in some cases, chefs who don’t handle stress well). I’d mention Avec in the West Loop, where the food can sometimes bristle with energy and sometimes mean you get shrimp that arrives a bit more burnt than pan-roasted or a cut of beef that manages to be both over- and under-cooked from slice to slice. Also Creepies, a restaurant I’ve loved despite the fact that certain dishes (brie gougères, freekeh crèpe, french fries) never seem to be precisely what they were on a previous visit. I haven’t gotten such a wide range of feedback from any restaurant I’ve reviewed, and yet I know it was the best restaurant opening of 2025. I tell people to order broadly and be prepared to dislike some dishes and be smitten by others.

In this quadrant we’ll also find big concept restaurants from big concept restaurant groups. These restaurants may have state-of-the-art kitchens, but they tend to churn through staff and use shift schedules to man the stations of the kitchen. Cooks pass through without really taking ownership of the dishes they’re cooking. In this category I’d mention restaurants that made our 50 Best Restaurants list, such as Zarella and Tre Dita. Does the Zarella thin crust pizza have blistered air bubbles? Usually. Are the fried squash blossoms at Tre Dita greasy and leathery? Usually, but when they’re great, they slay.

Now let’s scootch across the matrix to the lower right corner, where the cooking may be lacking but delivers it consistently. You can learn to appreciate these places, too, and show others how to make them work. I say this with all the love in my heart, but here is where I’ll put Club Lucky — that Italian restaurant where the bread is puffy and warm, the martinis are icy cold, and the pastas are, well, big. Everything tastes hastily assembled, which is fine for salad. I enjoy a quarter pink tomato that’s so hard and cold you need a steak knife to cut it, and even if the calamari makes up in sproinginess what it lacks in flavor, I’m okay with that. My family spends more money at Club Lucky than most restaurants in the neighborhood. It’s fast, friendly, and consistently what it is.

Let’s move to the lower left corner, where the food is inconsistent and overall not good. I don’t have much to say here other than here’s where you find the big deal swing-and-miss places (remember Le Select and Bambola?) as well as every bad hotel restaurant you’ve been subjected to. When famous chefs breeze into town to consult or add another outpost to an empire that expands too quickly, they often end up here. These places go downhill fast because training goes out the window thanks to the rotating cast of plug-and-play managers and cooks.

The happiest corner of all is the upper right. Have you ever noticed something interesting about Reddit and other sites where people share thoughtfully reasoned, carefully documented, and well-written personal reviews? They tend to focus almost exclusively on super high-end tasting menus filled with umpteen zillion courses or simple street foods like burgers, pizza, and sandwiches. Why? Because these are the most consistent restaurants. These are the places where the people cooking the food have cracked the code on making the same dish come out the same way every single flipping time. In the tasting menu places they serve only a limited number of dishes each night and rehearse their execution so well that any variance would be immediately notable. In a casual spot serving cheaper dishes we have the unsung heroes — those cooks who do the same thing over and over, day in and out. The cooks who develop the muscle memory and the touch that your grandma has. In this quadrant we have Oriole’s tasting menu and Johnnie’s Beef. (Not to mention McDonald’s french fries.) But you also have the smash burger from Leavitt Street Tavern that may take three rounds of beer to arrive, but when it does — oh, man. The same lacy-edged thing of beauty every time. When a great independent restaurant manages to find its way into this quadrant (I’m thinking of Maxwells Trading, Virtue, or El Che), when said restaurant may be busy or slow, hectic or relaxed, two minutes after 5 p.m. on Wednesday or 8 p.m. on Saturday and still deliver food that comes out the same every time, that’s reason for celebration.

John Kessler is a freelance dining critic for Chicago magazine.