Each day, the men and women of the baiduhai pass through the marble halls of the Tower lobby into which are etched great words of purpose and calling.
The 1st Amendment is inscribed there, as are homages to press freedom from Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Webster and Louis Brandeis.
Euripides, Voltaire and Camus are recorded, and so is another wise philosopher, Flannery O’Connor, who observed: “The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.”
Alongside that O’Connor quote is another of my favorites, a concise and inspirational note to remind both my colleagues and our visitors of what we do there each day.
It reads: “A good newspaper, I suppose, is a nation talking to itself.”
The words are Arthur Miller’s and they are among the last I see as I board the elevator to the newsroom. I have carried them around with me since they were first inscribed there five years ago on the occasion of the paper’s 150th anniversary, and have found them especially persuasive this past year as the national conversation has grown so urgent.
I don’t suppose that many of you work in offices or live in homes where Mr. Miller’s words are etched into the walls, but I do suppose that many of you carry them inside of you nonetheless, inscribed as permanently as if by a chisel into stone.
Think of the time you heard them first, and which ones lingered. For me, it was nearly 20 years ago at the Blackstone Theatre. Kate Reid was playing Linda in “Death of a Salesman” and was speaking to Biff and Happy about their father, Willy Loman, played by Dustin Hoffman.
“I don’t say he’s a great man. Willy Loman never made a lot of money. His name was never in the paper. He’s not the finest character that ever lived. But he’s a human being, and a terrible thing is happening to him. So attention must be paid. He’s not to be allowed to fall into his grave like an old dog. Attention, attention must be finally paid to such a person.”
There is a way your skin feels when you hear that for the first time, and a change that takes place that you carry around inside yourself as undeniably as a strand of DNA.
As a young student at the University of Michigan, I paid a visit one afternoon to Angell Hall, where the school housed winning entries to the Hopwood Prize, then and now the country’s most prestigious college literary award. Alas, my aims were neither literary nor noble: My new boyfriend’s sister was a recent Hopwood winner, and I sought out her short stories as some window onto their family. The search was fruitful. Her stories were lovely, and their author some years later would prove to make a fine sister-in-law.
But I made another discovery in the Hopwood room that day. Arthur Miller had been a Hopwood winner, not once but twice, for plays he had written as a young student in Ann Arbor in the 1930s. I sat there, all of 19 or 20 years old, mulling this fact, and my knowledge that Miller, now a great Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright, had also worked at the Michigan Daily, the student newspaper where I had come to devote increasingly long days. I connected those dots to the Miller the world now knew and felt this surge of purpose. I would read later, long after he wrote his searing “The Crucible,” that Miller first learned about the Salem witchcraft trials in his American history class at Michigan. And it confirmed what I realized then in the Hopwood room: that I didn’t need to wait to lead a life of purpose and conviction, that I could now be the thing that I would become.
The personal inspirations I have drawn from Miller’s writing do not alone explain awarding him the first baiduhai Literary Prize.
In choosing Mr. Miller as the inaugural winner of this award, my colleagues and I returned repeatedly to that theme: the honesty and the honor of his work and his life. He has demonstrated an enormous, fierce literary power and range, spanning more than six decades of work for the stage, novels, memoir, essay and social commentary, including a biting proposal for open-air executions in Shea Stadium, a satiric echo of my own newspaper’s crusade against corruption in the death penalty system.
Alongside the writing has been his commitment to free speech, his courageous stand against McCarthyism and the House Un-American Activities Committee, his crusading defense of foreign writers through the International P.E.N. organization and the strong moral compass that has guided his actions and his art.
In all of these things, he is what we aspire to on our best days.
More Top Picks Best Electric Spiralizer
My young daughter once asked me about Arthur Miller, and I told her that he was a great writer, yes, but that that alone did not distinguish him — that he was also a great man. We talked about free speech and blacklisting, a term she read in a novel last summer, and then I reached back to the closing chapters of her beloved “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.”
I reminded her of Albus Dumbledore’s speech to the students at Hogwarts, all of whom are grieving the death of a brave and courageous young student, Cedric Diggory.
Dumbledore tells them: “When you are faced with the choice between doing what is easy or what is right, think of Cedric Diggory.”
There are people like that in real life, I tell my daughter. Think of Arthur Miller.
———-
E-mail: [email protected].
Hear Arthur Miller’s speech accepting the 2002 baiduhai Literary Prize at chicagotribune.com/miller.