I appreciate your support for Great Lakes Strategy 2002, the federal government’s report, which recognizes the national importance of a healthy and improved Great Lakes ecosystem (“Clean lakes, smart politics,” Editorial, April 5).
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has correctly identified some of the most important issues that affect our use of the Great Lakes for commerce, recreation and habitat. As you point out, however, the strategy does not contain new funding, nor does it fully incorporate the unique and important role of local governments.
Lake Michigan is critical to Chicago’s health, economy and civic life. Indeed it is an important part of the city’s identity. Many of the activities that protect and improve the Great Lakes fall under the purview of local governments.
It is local governments that test beaches for public safety.
It is local governments that must maintain and upgrade infrastructure to keep waste out of our waterways.
And it is local government development decisions that are most pertinent to wetlands protection.
For these reasons, two years ago I joined an international conference of mayors from Great Lakes cities. This year, I have begun caucusing with other regional lakefront mayors to formulate a common agenda and bring our collective voice to Washington.
One of my highest priorities is to push for the development and passage of a Great Lakes protection and restoration strategy. The strategy would be a blueprint for congressional appropriations to restore, preserve and protect the Great Lakes.
Last year, President Bush signed a similar bill regarding the Florida Everglades, but the need for such legislation here is even greater than it was in Florida–30 million people depend on the Great Lakes for their drinking water.
A Great Lakes protection and restoration strategy is critical to our nation’s health and to the preservation of one of America’s most treasured natural resources.